BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
European Court of Human Rights |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> ROSIVAL AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA - 17684/02 [2008] ECHR 881 (23 September 2008) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2008/881.html Cite as: [2008] ECHR 881 |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF ROSIVAL AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
(Application no. 17684/02)
JUDGMENT
(Friendly settlement)
STRASBOURG
23 September 2008
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Rosival and Others v. Slovakia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Nicolas Bratza, President,
Lech
Garlicki,
Giovanni Bonello,
Ljiljana
Mijović,
David Thór Björgvinsson,
Ján
Šikuta,
Päivi Hirvelä, judges,
and
Fatoş Aracı, Deputy
Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 2 September 2008,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
THE FACTS
THE LAW
“I, Marica Pirošíková, the Agent of the Government of the Slovak Republic before the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter ‘the Court’), declare that, ex gratia and with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the Court and lodged by the applicants whose particulars appear in Appendix 1, the Government of the Slovak Republic (hereinafter “the Government”) undertake to secure restitution of the real property which is the subject of this application, as described in Appendix 2, namely forest lands and forests (hereinafter ‘the real property’), to the applicants (to each of them in equal share) within six months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision pursuant to Article 39 of the European Convention on Human Rights. If the applicants do not acquire the ownership of the real property or parts thereof within the mentioned time-limit, the Government will pay to the applicants jointly such amounts as listed in Appendix 2 and correspond to its official price (official price of the forest lands and forests) fixed on the basis of the expert opinion of Ing. Juraj Blaško no. 1/2002 of 24 February 2002. This undertaking will be discharged by the Government within seven months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision pursuant to Article 39 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The Government further undertake, within three months from the date of the notification of the Court’s decision pursuant to Article 39 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to pay the applicants jointly a global sum of 35,000 (thirty five thousand) euros in respect of any other pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses they have incurred. This amount will be converted into Slovakian korunas (SKK) at the rate applicable at the date of payment, free of any tax that may be payable.
In the event of failure to pay any sum within the set time-limit (namely seven months or three months, as mentioned above), the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that time-limit until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
This arrangement will constitute the final resolution of the case and its implementation will be subject to the supervision of the Committee of Ministers.
The Government finally undertake not to request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber under Article 43 § 1 of the Convention.”
“We, the applicants listed in Appendix 1 to this declaration, note that, ex gratia and with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter ‘the Court’), the Government of the Slovak Republic (hereinafter ‘the Government’) undertake to secure restitution of the real property which is the subject of this application, as described in Appendix 2, namely forest lands and forests (hereinafter “the real property”), to us (to each of us in equal share) within six months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision pursuant to Article 39 of the European Convention on Human Rights. We note that if we do not acquire the ownership of the real property or parts thereof within the mentioned time-limit, the Government will pay to us jointly such amounts as listed in Appendix 2 and correspond to its official price (official price of the forest lands and forests) fixed on the basis of the expert opinion of Ing. Juraj Blaško no. 1/2002 of 24 February 2002. This undertaking will be discharged by the Government within seven months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision pursuant to Article 39 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Further, we note that the Government undertake, within three months from the date of the notification of the Court’s decision pursuant to Article 39 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to pay us jointly a global sum of 35,000 (thirty five thousand) euros in respect of any other pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses we have incurred. This amount will be converted into Slovakian korunas at the rate applicable at the date of payment, free of any tax that may be payable.
Finally, we note that, in the event of failure to pay any sum within the set time-limit (namely seven months or three months, as mentioned above), the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that time-limit until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
We accept this proposal and waive any further claims against Slovakia in respect of the facts of this application. We declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.
This declaration is made in the context of a friendly settlement which the Government and the applicants have reached.
We lastly undertake not to request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber under Article 43 § 1 of the Convention.”
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
Done in English, and notified in writing on 23 September 2008, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Fatoş Aracı Nicolas Bratza
Deputy
Registrar President
APPENDIX 1
List of the applicants
APPENDIX 2
THE REAL PROPERTY (lands and forests)
Cadastral area: Sklabinský Podzámok Certificate of ownership no. 389 |
|||||
Register "C" |
|||||
Plot no.: |
Acreage (m²) |
Price (SKK) |
Plot no.: |
Acreage (m²) |
Price (SKK) |
282/1 |
73 1000 |
16,251,661.99 |
319 |
4676 |
77,422.55 |
284 |
3951 |
16,793.40 |
320 |
3866 |
64,011.03 |
285 |
41 0418 |
6,829,060.95 |
322 |
23 7997 |
6,953,800.20 |
286 |
57 8902 |
12,414,117.14 |
323 |
36 4352 |
10,054,736.51 |
287 |
2596 |
2,605.37 |
326 |
52 0207 |
8,927,106.76 |
288 |
469 |
8,012.10 |
341/1 |
36 0063 |
9,838,581.70 |
289 |
6321 |
68,241.52 |
341/2 |
52 |
1,443.58 |
290 |
4282 |
73,151.00 |
342 |
35 7816 |
7,158,329.90 |
291 |
641 |
9,432.56 |
343 |
2 2351 |
337,612.93 |
292 |
64 2028 |
9,213,005.85 |
344 |
14 6741 |
3,929,004.74 |
293 |
1 6559 |
125,628.89 |
346 |
532 |
14,617.20 |
294 |
1499 |
22,058.36 |
347 |
4732 |
19,655.46 |
298 |
33 4852 |
7,713,440.42 |
348 |
2870 |
78,855.95 |
299 |
36 8113 |
6,658,582.93 |
350 |
58 0195 |
10,856,157.93 |
300 |
1589 |
5,663.27 |
351 |
6446 |
117,404.43 |
301 |
4029 |
22,892.69 |
352 |
1222 |
22,256.94 |
302 |
2340 |
9,685.37 |
353 |
2961 |
9,800.19 |
303 |
32 2449 |
4,376,643.23 |
354 |
826 |
14,655.73 |
304 |
1 3965 |
58,620.78 |
355 |
3158 |
56,032.44 |
305 |
1 2371 |
204,831.98 |
356 |
35 7741 |
6,393,091.97 |
306 |
5 6702 |
467,006.88 |
357 |
763 |
5,678.24 |
308 |
13 9278 |
719,049.47 |
358 |
16 5315 |
3,548,270.38 |
310 |
20 9607 |
2,061,397.84 |
359 |
595 |
13,435.88 |
311 |
700 |
2,461.63 |
360 |
376 |
8,490.58 |
312 |
2075 |
5,751.39 |
361 |
396 |
8,942.20 |
313 |
10 1492 |
1,103,529.53 |
362 |
1123 |
29,591.99 |
316 |
1 5185 |
211,842.00 |
363 |
25 8312 |
6,517,958.10 |
318 |
8 8175 |
1,296,231.64 |
|
|
|
Register "E" |
|||||
Plot no.: |
Acreage (m²) |
Price (SKK) |
Plot no.: |
Acreage (m²) |
Price (SKK) |
472/1 |
380 |
5,591.84 |
512 |
2 5275 |
460,347.04 |
477 |
4193 |
98,783.64 |
513/1 |
1108 |
20,180.59 |
506 |
1 4281 |
107,392.31 |
544 |
124 |
3,267.50 |
Total price (SKK) |
145,703,908.61 |
||||
Total acreage (m²) |
752 2633 |
1 For a comprehensive description of the facts of the case and the relevant domestic law see the decision on admissibility of the application in the Court’s database HUDOC (http://echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc).