BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
European Court of Human Rights |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Peskova v Czech Republic - 22186/03 [2011] ECHR 1264 (08 June 2011) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1264.html Cite as: [2011] ECHR 1264 |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
Resolution
CM/ResDH(2011)551
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Pešková against Czech Republic
(Application No. 22186/03, judgment of 26/11/2009, final on 26/02/2010)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);
Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become final;
Recalling that the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case concerns the absence of adequate compensation for the privation of property acquired under the communist regime (violation of article 1 of Protocol 1) (see details in Appendix);
Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgment;
Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;
Having satisfied itself that, within the time-limit set, the respondent state paid the applicant the just satisfaction provided in the judgment (see details in Appendix),
Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded by the Court in its judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate:
- of individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state (see Appendix), that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and
DECIDES to close the examination of this case.
Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)55
Information about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of
Pešková against Czech Republic
Introductory case summary
This case concerns the absence of adequate and reasonable compensation for the privation in 2001 of property acquired under the communist regime (violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
I. Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures
a) Details of just satisfaction
Pecuniary damage |
Non-pecuniary damage |
Costs and expenses |
Total |
30000 EUR |
- |
240 EUR |
30240 EUR |
Paid on 21 May 2010 |
b) Individual measures
The European Court awarded the applicants just satisfaction in respect of pecuniary damage. Consequently, no other individual measure was considered necessary by the Committee of Ministers.
II. General measures
See Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)30 adopted in the cases of Pincová and Pinc and Zvolský and Zvolská against the Czech Republic.
III. Conclusions of the respondent state
The government considers that no individual measure is required, apart from the payment of the just satisfaction, that the general measures adopted will prevent similar violations and that the Czech Republic has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
1 Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 June 2011 at the 1115th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies