BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

    No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
    Thank you very much for your support!



    BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

    European Court of Human Rights


    You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Senas Servis Endustrisi A.S. against Turkey - 19520/02 [2011] ECHR 1682 (08 August 2011)
    URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1682.html
    Cite as: [2011] ECHR 1682

    [New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)1671

    Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

    11 cases against Turkey


    (see details in Appendix)



    The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);


    Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;


    Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases concerns late payment of compensation for expropriation and of default interest (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) (see details in Appendix);


    Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;


    Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;


    Having satisfied itself that the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments (see details in Appendix),


    Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded by the Court in its judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate:

    - of individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and


    - of general measures preventing similar violations;


    DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state (see Appendix) that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and


    DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

    Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)167


    Information about the measures to comply with the judgments in
    11 cases against Turkey


    Introductory case summary


    These cases concern the violation of the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions due to the administration’s delay in paying additional compensation granted by domestic courts for expropriation of their property, and on account of the considerable difference between the rate of default interest applicable at the material time and the average inflation rate in Turkey (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).


    I. Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures


    a) Details of just satisfaction


    Case and application number

    Judgment of

    Final on

    Pecuniary damage

    Non-pecuniary damage

    Costs and expenses

    Total

    Senaş Servis Endüstrisi A.Ş., (19520/02)

    21/10/2008

    06/04/2009

    117 175 EUR

    -

    1000 EUR

    118 175 EUR

    Paid on 24/06/2009

    Gülşen and others

    (54902/00)

    3/05/2007

    03/08/2007

    533 330 EUR

    -

    -

    533 330 EUR

    Paid on 31/10/2007

    Bildirici (43227/04)

    8/06/2010

    08/09/2010

    14 200 EUR

    -

    -

    14 200 EUR

    Paid on 01/12/2010

    Üçpınar (41479/05)

    21/07/2009

    21/10/2009

    21 700 EUR

    -

    -

    21 700 EUR

    Paid on 22/02/2010

    Terece and others (41054/98)

    24/10/2006

    24/01/2007

    173 000 EUR

    -

    1 500 EUR

    174 500 EUR

    Paid on 17/12/2007

    Çırak and others (33433/02)

    22/07/2008

    26/01/2009

    10 557 EUR

    -

    -

    10557 EUR

    Paid on 22/04/2009

    Kurt and Fırat (26828/03)

    21/04/2009

    21/07/2009

    1 100 EUR

    6 000 EUR

    -

    7 100 EUR

    Paid on 04/11/2009

    Mehmet Siret Atalay (3816/03)

    31/03/2009

    14/09/2009

    3 500 EUR

    -

    -

    3 500 EUR

    Paid on 14/12/2009

    Kemal Özer and others (783/03)

    20/10/2009

    20/01/2010

    13 000 EUR

    -

    -

    13 000 EUR

    Paid on 29/04/2010

    Doğangün (30302/03)

    02/06/2009

    02/09/2009

    -

    EUR 5000

    -

    EUR 5000

    Paid on 02/12/2009

    Erdoğan ve Fırat (15121/03)

    02/06/2009

    20/07/2010

    02/09/2009

    20/10/2010

    13 350 EUR

    -

    -

    13 350 EUR

    Paid on 02/12/2009


    b) Individual measures


    Given the just satisfaction awarded in respect of the damages sustained by the applicants, no other individual measure was considered necessary by the Committee of Ministers.



    II. General measures


    Measures have already been taken to prevent similar violations (See Resolutions ResDH(2001)70 and ResDH(2001)71 closing the Aka and Akkuş cases) including in particular the entry into force on 1 January 2000 of Law No. 4489 which aligned the legal rate of default interest with the annual discount rate applied by the Turkish Central Bank to short-term debt (this rate is kept under constant review in the light in particular of the recorded rate of inflation in the country).


    III. Conclusions of the respondent state


    The government considers that no individual measure is required, apart from the payment of the just satisfaction, that the general measures adopted will prevent similar violations and that Turkey has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

    1 Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1682.html