BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Sergey Vyacheslavovich MOSKALENKO v Russia - 34382/04 [2011] ECHR 1792 (11 October 2011) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1792.html Cite as: [2011] ECHR 1792 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no.
34382/04
by Sergey Vyacheslavovich
MOSKALENKO
against Russia
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 11 October 2011 as a Chamber composed of:
Nina
Vajić,
President,
Anatoly
Kovler,
Peer
Lorenzen,
Mirjana
Lazarova Trajkovska,
Julia
Laffranque,
Linos-Alexandre
Sicilianos,
Erik
Møse,
judges,
and
Søren Nielsen,
Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 July 2004,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicant, Mr Sergey Vyacheslavovich Moskalenko, is a Russian national who was born in 1971 and lives in Volgograd. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.
The applicants complained under Article 3 of the Convention about the ill-treatment by the police and the lack of effective investigation into the matter. He also complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him and under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention about a violation of his right to be presumed innocent.
The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Court’s letter.
By letter dated 3 May 2011, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 8 September 2010 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant received this letter on 4 June 2011. However, no response has been received.
THE LAW
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Søren Nielsen Nina
Vajić
Registrar President