[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> O.A.M. and 14 Others v Denmark - 67411/10 [2011] ECHR 283 (25 January 2011) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/283.html Cite as: [2011] ECHR 283

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

FIFTH SECTION

PARTIAL DECISION

Application no. 67411/10
by O.A.M. and 14 Others against Denmark

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 25 January 2011 as a Chamber composed of:

Karel Jungwiert, President,
Peer Lorenzen,
Mark Villiger,
Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre,
Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,
Ganna Yudkivska,
Julia Laffranque, judges,
and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 November 2010,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The application was lodged by O.A.M. and 14 others, who are nationals from respectively Syria, Iran and Afghanistan.

On 19 November 2010, the Acting President of the Chamber granted the applicants’ request to apply Rule 39 until further notice and to authorise anonymity (Rule 47 § 3). The Acting President also decided to communicate the application and that in due course the admissibility and merits of the case be considered together (Article 29 § 1).

The applicants were represented before the Court by the Danish Refugee Council. The Danish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Thomas Winkler from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 25 November 2010 the applicants’ representative informed the Court that the applicants listed as no. 7 in the application wanted to withdraw their complaints against Denmark because they were not being returned to Greece as stated in the original application, but to Norway.

THE LAW

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention as regards the applicants listed as no. 7 in the application.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list as regards these applicants.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases as regards the applicants listed as no. 7 in the application.

Claudia Westerdiek Karel Jungwiert Registrar President