BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Cornelia EFTIMESCU v Romania - 22233/08 [2012] ECHR 659 (27 March 2012) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/659.html Cite as: [2012] ECHR 659 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no.
22233/08
Cornelia EFTIMESCU
against Romania
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 27 March 2012 as a Committee composed of:
Alvina
Gyulumyan, President,
Ineta
Ziemele,
Mihai
Poalelungi, judges,
and Marialena Tsirli,
Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 22 April 2008,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicant, Ms Cornelia Eftimescu, is a Romanian national who was born in 1941 and lives in Iasi. The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms I. Cambrea, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The applicant’s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, communicated to the Government on 12 May 2009, concerned the application of the restitution laws in Romania.
On 19 July 2011 the applicant informed the Court that she wanted to withdraw the application since her claims under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 had been satisfied by the domestic authorities. This request was reiterated on 29 November 2011 when the applicant submitted documents in support of her assertions.
THE LAW
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue her application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Marialena Tsirli Alvina Gyulumyan
Deputy Registrar President