[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> SHTABOVENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - 22722/07 - Committee Judgment [2013] ECHR 381 (25 April 2013) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2013/381.html Cite as: [2013] ECHR 381

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

 

 

FIFTH SECTION

 

 

 

 

 

CASE OF SHTABOVENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

 

(Application no. 22722/07 and 99 other applications)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

 

STRASBOURG

 

25 April 2013

 

 

 

This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.




In the case of Shtabovenko and Others v. Ukraine,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

          Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,
          Ann Power-Forde,
          Helena Jäderblom, judges,
and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 2 April 2013,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE




  The case originated in 100 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Ukrainian nationals, a company based in Ukraine and a Russian national, whose details are specified in the appended tables (“the applicants”).




  The applicant Mr Viktor Andriyovych Bondar died (application no. 13890/09). His wife, Ms Nadiya Yefremivna Bondar, manifested a wish to pursue the application on his behalf.




  By letter dated 19 December 2012, the Government informed the Court that the applicant Mr Vladimir Shabodinovich Khamzatov (application no. 33262/10) had died. A copy of the letter was forwarded to the deceased applicant’s address on 19 February 2013 by registered post for comments to be submitted by 11 March 2013. The reader was warned that in the absence of response, the Court would assume that the applicant had died and that no individual was entitled and wished to pursue the application. No reply was received.




  By letter dated 27 October 2012 the applicant Ms Olena Georgiyivna Mykhaylova (application no. 475/11) informed the Court that she wanted to withdraw the application since the judgment rendered in her favour had been fully enforced.




  The Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy.




  On 4 October 2012 the applications above were communicated to the Government of Ukraine.




  The Russian Government, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings in respect of the applicant in application no. 63882/09 (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), indicated that they did not wish to exercise that right.

THE FACTS

THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE




  On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became final and enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time.




  Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues.

THE LAW

I.  THE STANDING OF THE APPLICANT IN APPLICATION No. 13890/09




  The Court considers that the applicant’s wife in application no. 13890/09 (see paragraph 2 above) has standing to continue the proceedings in the applicant’s stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v. Ukraine, no. 19916/04, § 12, 14 December 2006).

II.  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1




  The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. They relied on, expressly or in substance, Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

A.  Applications tabulated in Appendices 1 and 2




  The Court considers that the applications tabulated in Appendices 1 and 2 should be joined, given their common factual and legal background.

1.  Applications tabulated in Appendix 1




  In their observations the Government submitted that the debtor in respect of the judgments indicated in Appendix 1 was a private company. However, between 28 November 2005 and 30 July 2010 the Fuel and Energy (Complex Enterprises) Register included the debtor in the procedure for recovery of debts pursuant to the 2005 Act on measures designed to ensure the stable functioning of fuel and energy enterprises and all enforcement proceedings in respect of it were frozen. Therefore, the Government bore responsibility for the debtor’s actions from the moment when the applicants’ judgments became final and until it was excluded from the Register. They argued that those periods could not be considered excessive. As regards the period after 30 July 2010, the Government, referring to the Court’s case law (see Dovgal v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 50726/06, 20 October 2009), maintained that the State was responsible for the non-enforcement in the applicant’s favour only insofar as the State Bailiffs’ Service was involved, while the applicants had not challenged before the domestic courts the Bailiffs’ alleged inactivity in the enforcement of their judgments. Given the above the Government claimed that the applications should be declared inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.




  Given its findings in previous similar cases against Ukraine (see, for instance, Andreyenko and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 22312/03, 19 June 2007 and Gapeyev v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21659/06, 17 November 2009), the Court considers that these applications must be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

2.  Applications tabulated in Appendix 2




  The Government submitted in their observations that the debtor in respect of the judgments specified in Appendix 2 was a private legal entity. They reiterated that the State’s positive obligation to enforce the judgments against a private entity extends no further than the involvement of State bodies in the enforcement proceedings. They claimed that the applicants’ complaints are manifestly ill-founded given that they failed to challenge the actions of the State Bailiffs’ Service.




  The Court observes that the parties’ submissions did not disclose that there were any factors, attributable to the State, which impeded or blocked the enforcement of the judgments at issue for an excessively long period of time. In any event it appeared after the communication of the applications to the respondent Government that on 5 July 2007, that is more than six months before the applications were lodged with this Court, the debtor had been finally liquidated without legal successor due to bankruptcy and excluded from the State companies register. These applications must, therefore, be declared inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded pursuant to Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

B.  Applications tabulated in Appendix 3




  In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issue raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.




  The Court notes that the applicant in application no. 33262/10, Mr Vladimir Shabodinovich Khamzatov, has died and that no heir has requested permission to pursue the application.




  It also notes that the applicant in application no. 475/11, Ms Olena Georgiyivna Mykhaylova, informed the Court that she did not intend to pursue the application since the judgment, rendered in her favour had been fully enforced.




  In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the applications out of the list.

C.  Applications tabulated in Appendices 4 and 5




  In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issue raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.




  The Court notes that the above complaints of the applicants tabulated in Appendices 4 and 5 (see paragraph 11 above) are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.




  The Court finds that the decisions in the applicants’ favour were not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible.




  Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov, cited above, §§ 56-58 and 66-70), the Court finds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement.

III.  OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION




  Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.




  It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

IV.  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION




  Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”




  In the present case, bearing in mind its previous decision on the matter (see Kharuk and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 703/05 and 115 other applications, § 25, 26 July 2012), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award 3,000 euros (EUR) to each applicant in the applications which concern non-enforcement delays exceeding three years (the applications tabulated in Appendix 4) and EUR 1,500 to each applicant in the other applications (the applications tabulated in Appendix 5). These sums are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.




  The Court further notes that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the judgments which remain enforceable.




  The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY

1.  Decides to join the applications tabulated in Appendices 1 and 2;

 

2.  Declares inadmissible the applications indicated in Appendices 1 and 2;

 

3.  Decides to join the applications tabulated in Appendix 3;

 

4.  Decides to strike the applications enumerated in Appendix 3 out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention;

 

5.  Decides to join the applications tabulated in Appendices 4 and 5;

 

6.  Declares the complaints of the applicants listed in Appendices 4 and 5, under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints, admissible and the remainder of the applications inadmissible;

 

7.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;

 

8.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;

 

9.  Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable, and is to pay, within three months, EUR 3,000 (three thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 4 and EUR 1,500 (one thousand five hundred euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 5 in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 April 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

      Stephen Phillips                                                          Boštjan M. Zupančič
     Deputy Registrar                                                                   President




 

APPENDIX 1

(inadmissible applications)

 

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decision
1.	63284/09 17/11/2009	Nadiya Kostyantynivna KRAVCHENYUK 11/08/1959	Oleksandriya Court, 05/05/2009
2.	63328/09 17/11/2009	Tetyana Yuriyivna PASICHNA 19/04/1960	Oleksandriya Court, 05/05/2009

 

APPENDIX 2

(inadmissible applications)

 

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decision
3.	6147/11 14/01/2011	Olga Illivna YAKOVENKO 19/08/1951	Krukivskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 04/03/2005
4.	6164/11 14/01/2011	Stanislav Viktorovych TSARENKO 01/01/1971	Krukivskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 20/12/2004
5.	6214/11 14/01/2010	Volodymyr Panteliyovych PALIYENKO 19/07/1944	Krukivskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 24/05/2004

 

 

APPENDIX 3

(applications struck out of the Court’s list of cases)

 

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decision
6.	33262/10 25/05/2010	Vladimir Shabodinovich KHAMZATOV 01/01/1948	1) Torez Court, 16/04/2008   2) Torez Court, 16/07/2008   3) Torez Court, 18/07/2008
7.	475/11 13/12/2010	Olena Georgiyivna MYKHAYLOVA 01/01/1964	Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 07/04/2010

 

 

APPENDIX 4

(non-enforcement delays three years and more)

 

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decisions
8.	22722/07 05/05/2007	Vasyl Petrovych SHTABOVENKO 27/12/1952	Tsentralnyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 18/04/2002
9.	13890/09 18/02/2009	Viktor Andriyovych BONDAR 09/03/1939	Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007
10.	57014/09 19/10/2009	Valeriy Volodymyrovych SACHEK 02/04/1966	Ovruch Court, 03/04/2002
11.	59484/09 02/11/2009	Mariya Yosypivna TABACHUK 04/07/1949	Popilnyanskyy District Court of the Zhytomyr Region, 30/10/2006, as amended by the Zhytomyr Regional Court of Appeal, 17/01/2008
12.	59562/09 28/10/2009	Oksana Vladimirovna SECHKAREVA 18/10/1982	Krasnyy Luch Court, 11/10/2006
13.	59650/09 22/10/2009	Oleksandr Volodymyrovych BURYAK 27/06/1955	1) Oleksandriya Court, 29/01/2008, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 05/11/2008   2) Oleksandriya Court, 15/04/2008, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 04/12/2008
14.	59976/09 09/11/2009	Mykola Viktorovych TOCHENYY 13/05/1963	Obolonskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/09/2003, quashed by the Higher Administrative Court on 02/11/2010
15.	60221/09 26/10/2009	Anatoliy Ivanovych GUMONITSKYY 01/01/1950	Tetiyiv Court, 31/01/2008
16.	60971/09 05/11/2009	Mykola Stepanovych VASYLYK 21/01/1967	Kolomyya Court, 09/12/2004
17.	61111/09 04/11/2009	Viktor Sergiyovych YALPUTA 19/09/1954	Oleksandriya Court, 15/05/2008
18.	61123/09 01/11/2009	Anatoliy Ivanovich YELISEYEV 06/01/1947	1) Novogrodivka Court, 31/07/2002   2) Decision of a Labour Disputes Commission of the Novogrodivska Mine, lodged with the State Bailiffs’ Service on 16 April 2004.
19.	61576/09 16/11/2009	Andriy Mykolayovych BARDAS 07/09/1968	Military Court of the Cherkassy Garrison, 31/08/2005
20.	61892/09 11/11/2009	Mykola Tykhonovych GORBACHUK 25/01/1949	Solomyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/01/2006
21.	62027/09 11/11/2009	Svitlana Mykolayivna BYSHA 06/01/1946	Oleksandriya Court, 11/02/2008
22.	62319/09 12/11/2009	Olena Fedorivna DAVYSKYBA 25/08/1932	Trostyanets Court, 15/05/2007
23.	62469/09 19/11/2009	Anatoliy Andriyovych MAKSYMENKO 29/09/1959	Lubny Court, 19/06/2007
24.	63000/09 27/10/2009	Svetlana Nikiforovna CHERNOVA 15/04/1964	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidnyy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise, 05/02/2007
25.	63028/09 27/10/2009	Larisa Ivanovna KLIPENKO 21/06/1951	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidnyy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise , 05/02/2007
26.	63090/09 27/10/2009	Mariya Vasilyevna BUT 12/02/1947	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidniy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise, 27/02/2007
27.	63100/09 27/10/2009	Nina Vasilyevna LITVINOVA 25/06/1950	Kostyantynivka Court, 15/10/2004
28.	63106/09 27/10/2009	Lyudmila Alekseyevna KOROLEVA 16/01/1942	Kostyantynivka Court, 29/03/2001
29.	63114/09 27/10/2009	Lidiya Ivanovna TISHCHENKO 06/10/1941	Kostyantynivka Court, 25/08/2005
30.	63123/09 27/10/2009	Vladimir Vladimirovich PASECHNIK 13/11/1970	Kostyantynivka Court, 22/12/1997
31.	63132/09 27/10/2009	Igor Viktorovich MIROSHNICHENKO 02/04/1971	Kostyantynivka Court, 14/03/2003
32.	63150/09 27/10/2009	Eduard Mikhaylovich SOLOVYEV 27/06/1969	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 22/12/1997   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 27/01/2003
33.	63157/09 27/10/2009	Lyudmila Andreyevna GORCHAKOVA 22/11/1937	Kostyantynivka Court, 02/04/2001
34.	63163/09 27/10/2009	Yekaterina Vasilyevna NESTERENKO 21/10/1956	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 02/08/2002   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 18/04/2003
35.	63180/09 27/10/2009	Yevgeniy Nikolayevich GUZHVA 02/01/1968	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 30/09/2004   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 20/10/2004   3) Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise, 14/07/2006
36.	63198/09 27/10/2009	Lyudmila Alekseyevna SEMCHISHYNA 07/08/1927	Kostyantynivka Court, 02/04/2001
37.	63206/09 27/10/2009	Yekaterina Vasilyevna IVASHCHENKO 19/03/1952	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidnyy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise, 05/02/2007
38.	63212/09 27/10/2009	Zhanetta Petrovna SHUBINA 08/11/1932	Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise, 12/03/2001
39.	63213/09 27/10/2009	Natalya Vladimirovna MADYUDYA 15/10/1971	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise , 27/12/2000   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 08/05/2009
40.	63217/09 27/10/2009	Vadim Aleksandrovich STAROSTENKO 29/05/1962	Kostyantynivka Court, 01/02/2002
41.	63224/09 27/10/2009	Nina Stepanovna GEBUZA 09/10/1937	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 08/11/2002   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 08/11/2002
42.	63226/09 27/10/2009	Valentina Ivanovna KUSHCHENKOVA 07/04/1957	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise , 11/12/1997   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 19/03/2001
43.	63230/09 27/10/2009	Nina Alekseyevna VOLKOVA 23/11/1957	Kostyantynivka Court, 25/01/2002
44.	63235/09 27/10/2009	Tatyana Gennadyevna SAKHNO 31/01/1956	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidnyy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise , 05/11/2007
45.	63365/09 27/10/2009	Valentin Borisovich GOLOVCHENKO 07/07/1948	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 08/04/2002   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 23/01/2009
46.	63369/09 18/11/2009	Applicant 2:   Ivan Petrovich KOROLKOV 01/01/1940	1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/02/2007   2) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 20/03/2007
47.	63374/09 27/10/2009	Lidiya Prokofyevna ORLOVA 05/04/1939	Kostyantynivka Court, 17/09/2004
48.	63379/09 27/10/2009	Mikhail Mikhaylovich NEDOPEKIN 08/10/1950	Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise , 12/04/2003
49.	63385/09 27/10/2009	Stanislav Stepanovich GURKOVSKIY 11/09/1959	Kostyantynivka Court, 26/01/2009
50.	63393/09 27/10/2009	Irina Ivanovna SHTOFEL 10/02/1955	Kostyantynivka Court, 03/03/2005
51.	63399/09 27/10/2009	Aleksandr Mikhaylovich SHTOFEL 22/10/1949	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 03/04/2003   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 13/06/2006
52.	63401/09 27/10/2009	Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOVAL 17/12/1950	Kostyantynivka Court, 23/09/2002
53.	63408/09 27/10/2009	Vladimir Ivanovich KIYAN 02/04/1954	Kostyantynivka Court, 13/11/2001
54.	63413/09 27/10/2009	Nikolay Vasilyevich DUDNIK 20/01/1937	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Tekhbudsklo, State Enterprise, 25/09/2002   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 03/03/2009
55.	63418/09 27/10/2009	Valentina Ivanovna LISTRATENKO 01/10/1946	Kostyantynivka Court, 15/11/2001
56.	63425/09 27/10/2009	Galina Vladimirovna DUNAYTSEVA 28/02/1949	Kostyantynivka Court, 23/10/2002
57.	63435/09 27/10/2009	Alla Nikolayevna BOZHKO 18/03/1964	Kostyantynivka Court, 05/09/2002
58.	63479/09 27/10/2009	Olga Yefimovna GLADILINA 01/12/1947	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 14/05/2003   2) Kostyantynivka Court, 28/04/2004
59.	63569/09 17/11/2009	Sergiy Stepanovych NAKONECHNYY 01/01/1959	Tetiyiv Court, 04/12/2007
60.	63866/09 27/10/2009	Valentina Demyanovna KUZOVENINA 30/12/1948	Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/10/2007
61.	63882/09 23/11/2009	Anastasiya Semenovna DIKAREVA 31/10/1934	Sieverodonetsk Court, 18/07/2008
62.	64434/09 26/11/2009	Lyubov Yakivna LYAKHOVA 24/04/1948	1) Bakhchisaray Court, 11/02/2004   2) Bakhchisaray Court, 19/04/2007
63.	65379/09 30/11/2009	Sergey Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV 02/10/1966	Krasnyy Luch Court, 06/10/2008
64.	65682/09 24/11/2009	Andrey Vladimirovich LOBANOV 11/11/1976	Novogrodivka Court, 02/11/2005
65.	67048/09 10/12/2009	Pavlo Vasylyovych KOZIYCHUK 04/01/1931	Bershad Court, 28/05/2009
66.	1197/10 22/12/2009	Nina Dmytrivna VALENTYUK 13/09/1955   Mariya Opanasivna VALENTYUK 20/11/1929   Dmytro Anatoliyovych VALENTYUK 01/01/1984   Valentyna Anatoliyivna KLIMCHUK 30/07/1976	Khmelnytskyy Court, 07/04/2005, as amended by the Khmelnytskyy Regional Court of Appeal on 21/10/2005
67.	19486/10 18/03/2010	Anatoliy Vyacheslavovich VLADIMIRSKIY 12/09/1957	1) Bryanka Court, 18/04/2006   2) Bryanka Court, 17/06/2008
68.	24423/10 19/04/2010	Olena Vasylivna MORDOVINA 28/07/1959	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Pervomayskyy State Enterprise «Khimprom», 10/12/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of the Pervomayskyy State Enterprise «Khimprom», 18/02/2008   3) Pervomayskyy Court, 26/06/2008
69.	25755/10 23/04/2010	Igor Oleksandrovych BALESNYY 16/11/1975	Krasnyy Lyman Court, 12/12/2003
70.	37249/10 21/06/2010	Mykola Grygorovych PETNYAK 20/02/1966	Galytskyy District Court of Lviv, 22/07/2009
71.	46988/10 23/07/2010	Sergey Ivanovich MAYMURENKO 02/05/1947	1) Kramatorsk Court, 21/01/2009   2) Kramatorsk Court, 21/01/2009
72.	48871/10 30/07/2010	Yaroslava Petrivna VIVCHAR 10/04/1955	Lychakivskyy District Court of Lviv, 23/06/2009
73.	63837/10 18/10/2010	Anatoliy Grygorovych VORONKO 24/01/1939	Dniprovskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/05/2007
74.	67118/10 08/11/2010	Vasyl Dmytrovych NYZOVETS 01/09/1923	1) Shepetivka Court, 18/12/2007, as amended by the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal on 30/09/2008   2) Shepetivka Court, 26/02/2009
75.	70818/10 17/11/2010	Viktor Pavlovych OBLOG 08/11/1955 Shostka	Shostka Court, 26/12/2008
76.	70849/10 22/11/2010	MZHK MRIYA, TOV	Lugansk Regional Commercial Court, 02/04/2007
77.	71165/10 20/11/2010	Anatoliy Petrovych SANEVYCH 04/11/1962	Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court, 27/09/2007
78.	72636/10 29/11/2010	Valentina Viktorovna PROKOPENKO 19/05/1962	Pervomayskyy Court, 22/08/2008
79.	73013/10 29/11/2010	Valentina Nikolayevna SOKOLOVA 01/01/1965	Pervomayskyy Court, 10/07/2008
80.	73067/10 01/12/2010	Olga Petrivna KALASHNYUK 01/01/1939	Tetiyiv Court, 29/11/2007
81.	73241/10 30/11/2010	Tatyana Ivanovna POKHODZHAY 23/08/1953	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Pervomayskyy State Enterprise “Khimprom”, 10/12/2007   2) Pervomayskyy Court, 25/07/2008
82.	73818/10 20/11/2010	Iryna Ivanivna GULCHAK 01/01/1954	Staromiskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 29/07/2002
83.	73882/10 26/10/2010	Sergey Nikolayevich PUGACH 17/02/1967	Novogrodivka Court, 06/11/1996
84.	74828/10 29/11/2010	Galina Vasilyevna MAKSIMOVICH 01/01/1952	Pervomayskyy Court, 09/07/2008
85.	1330/11 22/12/2010	Viktor Ivanovych KOLOSOV 01/01/1946	1) Lysychansk Court, 03/02/2005   2) Lysychansk Court, 05/04/2005
86.	1397/11 21/12/2010	Anatoliy Dmytrovych KOLYADA 15/11/1957	Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 08/10/2009
87.	1437/11 20/12/2010	Anatoliy Kirillovich YOVZHENKO 28/03/1949	1) Selydove Court, 18/02/2009   2) Selydove Court, 20/02/2009
88.	2016/11 27/12/2010	Vladimir Ivanovich MALYUK 08/08/1955	Lysychansk Court, 25/11/2008
89.	3203/11 17/11/2010	Viktor Pavlovych OBLOG 08/11/1955	Shostka Court, 30/06/2009
90.	4481/11 28/12/2010	Vladimir Ivanovich MALYUK 08/08/1955	Lysychansk Court, 04/09/2008
91.	5406/11 12/01/2011	Mykola Yuriyovych PRYSHCHEPA 01/01/1948	Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007
92.	5779/11 13/11/2011	Nikolay Pavlovich ZAKHAROV 01/05/1949	Lugansk Regional Commercial Court, 20/05/2003
93.	5836/11 15/01/2011	Volodymyr Vasylyovych ZAMRYKOTA 04/09/1960	Fastiv Court, 05/03/2008
94.	5844/11 12/01/2011	Tamara Volodymyrivna ILYASHEVA 25/04/1951	Lysychansk Court, 02/02/2005
95.	5965/11 13/01/2011	Svitlana Fedorivna SHEMYAKINA 09/10/1944	Lysychansk Court, 20/01/2005

 




APPENDIX 5

(non-enforcement delays less than three years)

 

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicant name date of birth	Relevant domestic decisions
46.	63369/09 18/11/2009	Applicant 1:   Vladislav Valentinovich VOROBYEV 20/11/1940	1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/02/2007   2) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 20/03/2007
96.	27326/10 13/04/2010	Nikolay Vasilyevich PETUSHKOV 13/12/1956   Fedor Viktorovich MAKAROV 26/09/1954	Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal, 16/10/2009
97.	56006/10 14/09/2010	Oleksandr Grygorovych MASHCHENKO 20/08/1981	Sevastopol Administrative Court of Appeal, 19/05/2010
98.	477/11 13/12/2010	Tetyana Pavlivna DOLGOVA 01/01/1952	Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 12/04/2010
99.	480/11 13/12/2010	Olena Anatoliyivna OLIYNYK 01/01/1953	Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 05/10/2009
100.	5747/11 15/01/2011	Sergey Georgiyevich CHURSIN 01/01/1956	Tsentralno-Miskyy Court of Makiyivka, 28/04/2010