 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> GUSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 33633/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Second Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 214 (14 March 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/214.html Cite as: [2024] ECHR 214 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF GUSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 33633/21 and 21 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
14 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Gusev and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
Frédéric Krenc,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 15 February 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and Protocols to it.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, § 489, 7 February 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth
| Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses (in euros)[1] | |
25/05/2021 | Konstantin Viktorovich GUSEV 1977 | Savin Aleksandr Vasilyevich Stavropol | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Pyatigorsk
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | Stavropol Regional Court 11/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 12.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant's administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Stavropol Regional Court, 11/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
01/08/2021 | Dmitriy Andreyevich KONOSHONKIN 1996 |
| Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
| article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention of 8 days | Moscow City Court 18/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 11.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 12.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021 | 5,000 | |
16/09/2021 | Stanislav Vladimirovich SHANTALIN 1996 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 06/04/2021 | 4,000 | |
22/09/2021 | Ivan Aleksandrovich NAKONECHNYY 1993 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 28/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 28/04/2021 | 4,000 | |
21/09/2021 | Pavel Vladimirovich KRASNOV 1973 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 28/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 28/04/2021 | 4,000 | |
08/10/2021 | Aleksandr Alekseyevich BELKOV 1994 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 16/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to the police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 10.20 a.m. to 9.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 16/04/2021
| 4,000 | |
22/09/2021 | Nikolay Viktorovich BELYAYEV 1974 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 21/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 02/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 21/05/2021 | 4,000 | |
23/10/2021 | Denis Olegovich POPOV 1994 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow 23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 03/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 03/06/2021 | 4,000 | |
23/10/2021 | Andrey Vladimirovich KHABAROV 1998 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 23/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 23/06/2021 | 4,000 | |
23/10/2021 | Svetlana Azamatovna BATCHAYEVA 1997 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 19/05/2021
| 4,000 | |
15/11/2021 | Galina Grigoryevna KARPENKO 1953 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Vladivostok
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Primorye Regional Court 25/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 12.40 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 25/05/2021 | 4,000 | |
23/10/2021 | Mikhail Andreyevich BORZUNOV 1988 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 09/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 09/06/2021 | 4,000 | |
23/10/2021 | Anton Vladimirovich KRUGLOV 1987 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 03/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 03/06/2021 | 4,000 | |
23/10/2021 | Aleksey Nikolayevich VORONOV 1988 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 19/05/2021
| 4,000 | |
29/10/2021 | Alena Nikolayevna RYABOVA 1999 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 5 days | Moscow City Court 27/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 10.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 03/02/2021, hearing in the applicant's administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 27/05/2021 | 5,000 | |
29/10/2021 | Yekaterina Viktorovna SOKOLOVA 1966 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 25/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 10.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 03/02/2021, hearing in the applicant's administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 25/05/2021 | 4,000 | |
07/11/2021 | Toirdzhon Kurbonaliyevich SATTOROV 1999 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of Izzat Amono (human rights activist)
Moscow
02/04/2021
| article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 13/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 02/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 13/07/2021.
| 4,000 | |
27/11/2021 | Yevgeniy Andreyevich ZUBKOV 1994 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Volgograd
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Volgograd Regional Court 02/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 9.00 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 00.05 a.m. on 22/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Volgograd Regional Court, 02/06/2021. | 4,000 | |
19/11/2021 | Andrey Dmitriyevich BOYKO 1994 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Kurgan
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | community works of 30 hours | Kurgan Reginal Court 26/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 21/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Kurgan Reginal Court, 26/05/2021 | 4,000 | |
27/11/2021 | Yevgeniy Semenovich KIRILLOV 1990 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Nizhnekamsk
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/06/2021
| Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 23/01/2021 | 4,000 | |
27/11/2021 | Dmitriy Eduardovich KRIVOSHEIN 1988 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Perm
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court 04/06/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Perm Regional Court, 04/06/2021 | 3,500 | |
08/12/2021 | Konstantin Sergeyevich ULYANOV 1989 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 19/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 1.55 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 19/07/2021 | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.