BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> Giorgio Bernardi v European Parliament. [1997] EUECJ C-303/96P (6 March 1997)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1997/C30396.html
Cite as: [1997] EUECJ C-303/96P

[New search] [Help]


IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.
   

61996O0303
Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 March 1997.
Giorgio Bernardi v European Parliament.
Appeal - Ombudsman - Nominations - Appointment procedure - Action for annulment - Appeal clearly inadmissible and unfounded.
Case C-303/96 P.

European Court reports 1997 Page I-01239

 
   



1 Appeals - Pleas in law - Mere repetition of the pleas in law and arguments before the Court of First Instance - Inadmissible - Appeal dismissed
(EC Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 49 and 51; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c))
2 Appeals - Pleas in law - Plea in law directed against the decision of the Court of First Instance on costs - Inadmissible where all the other pleas in law are dismissed
(EC Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 51, second para.)


3 The combined effect of Article 51 of the Statute of the Court of Justice and Article 112(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure is that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested elements of the judgment of the Court of First Instance which the appellant seeks to have set aside, and also the legal arguments specifically advanced in support of the appeal.
That requirement is not satisfied by an appeal which merely repeats or reproduces word for word the arguments previously submitted to the Court of First Instance.
4 Where all the other pleas in law relied upon in an appeal against a decision of the Court of First Instance have been dismissed, the plea concerning the lawfulness of its decision on costs must, pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 51 of the Statute of Court of Justice, be dismissed as inadmissible.

 
  © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1997/C30396.html