BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Allied Dunbar Assurance Plc v Ireland [2001] EWCA Civ 1129 (12 June 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1129.html
Cite as: [2001] EWCA Civ 1129

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 1129
A3/2001/0658

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
BRISTOL MERCANTILE COURT
(His Honour Judge Weeks QC)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2
Tuesday, 12th June 2001

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE HENRY
LORD JUSTICE LONGMORE
and
MR JUSTICE CARNWATH

____________________

ALLIED DUNBAR ASSURANCE PLC
Claimant/Respondent
-v-
CHRISTINE JULIE IRELAND
Defendant/Appellant

____________________

Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of
Smith Bernal Reporting Limited
190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG
Tel: 020 7421 4040 Fax: 020 7831 8838
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

Mr S Salzedo (instructed by Messrs Streeter Marshall, Croydon) appeared on behalf of the Appellant Defendant.
Mr R Neill (Solicitor Advocate) (instructed by Messrs Bevan Ashford, Bristol) appeared on behalf of the Respondent Claimant.

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. LORD JUSTICE HENRY Here we have an appeal against a summary judgment given in a case where the allegation is fraud. Such an allegation must be proved to a high standard and there must be a clear, plain case, particularly where (as here) the litigant accused of fraud has filed an affidavit categorically denying the fraud.
  2. This may, when it is tried, prove to be a clear and plain case, but we cannot be satisfied on the material before us. We think there are too many loose ends, too many gaps in the evidence and no sufficiently detailed evidence of when the next day's price was either obtainable or obtained by Miss Ireland.
  3. Accordingly, for those reasons we will allow the appeal.
  4. Order: appeal allowed and judgment set aside; case to be tried by someone other than Judge Weeks QC; appellant to have the costs of the appeal, and the costs of the Part 24 application to be reserved to the trial judge; freezing order to continue until the end of the appeal; the police to preserve the appellant's computer and its software, the respondent's fax machines and the Saladin equipment for joint access of the parties, with liberty to the police to apply to this court on seven days' notice.
    [DOES NOT FORM PART OF APPROVED JUDGMENT]


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1129.html