BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
England and Wales Land Registry Adjudicator |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Land Registry Adjudicator >> Khela v Batshoof Investment Lte & Anor (Charges and charging orders : Bankruptcy and Insolvency) [2017] UKFTT 676 (PC) (07 August 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLandRA/2017/2016_0430.html Cite as: [2017] UKFTT 676 (PC) |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Mohinder Jit Kaur Khela (aka Mohindersit Kaur Khela) v (1) Batshoof Investment Limited (2) Jhalman Singh Khela (Charges and charging orders : Bankruptcy and Insolvency) [2017] UKFTT 676 (PC) (07 August 2017)
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] UKFTT 676 (PC) Applicant and 2nd Respondent were the registered proprietors of the property; 1st Respondent had a registered charge dated 1993. Nothing had been paid and no interest had accrued under the charge since 1993. A applied to have the charge removed. R1 objected on the basis that it had been acknowledged, by letter from R2's trustee in bankruptcy as agent for R2. Held that the trustee in bankruptcy was not R2's agent and also that in any event one mortgagor could not make on behalf of both proprietors an acknowledgement sufficient for section 29 of the Limitation Act 1980. The registrar was directed to respond to the application as if the objection had not been made.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2017] UKFTT 676 (PC)
