H54 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & ors v Eircom Ltd t/a Eir & ors [2018] IEHC 54 (15 January 2018)

BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

High Court of Ireland Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> High Court of Ireland Decisions >> Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & ors v Eircom Ltd t/a Eir & ors [2018] IEHC 54 (15 January 2018)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2018/H54.html
Cite as: [2018] IEHC 54

[New search] [Help]



Judgment
Title:
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & ors v Eircom Ltd t/a Eir & ors
Neutral Citation:
[2018] IEHC 54
High Court Record Number :
2017 11701 P
Date of Delivery:
01/15/2018
Court:
High Court
Judgment by:
McGovern J.
Status:
Approved

[2018] IEHC 54
THE HIGH COURT
Record Number: 2017/11701 P
      BETWEEN:
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION

UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP

UNIVERSAL CABLE PRODUCTIONS, LLC

WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.

PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION

DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC

COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC.

SONY PICTURES TELEVISION INC.

PLAINTIFFS
- AND -

EIRCOM LIMITED TRADING AS EIR

DIGIWEB LIMITED

IMAGINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMTIED

SKY SUBSCRIBERS SERVICES LIMITED

VIRGIN MEDIA IRELAND LIMITED

VODAFONE IRELAND LIMITED

MAGNET NETWORKS LIMITED

THREE IRELAND (HUTCHISON) LIMITED

THREE IRELAND SERVICES (HUTCHISON) LIMITED

DEFENDANTS

Ex-tempore judgment of Mr. Justice McGovern delivered on 15 January 2018

Having read the affidavits, legal submissions and draft order as well as on hearing counsel for the Plaintiffs, I am satisfied that the Defendant ISPs networks are being used to infringe copyright and that the proposed order will have the effect of preventing access to or at least make it difficult to access unlawful material and so, would discourage users from doing so.

I am also satisfied that the order would not place an unreasonable burden on the ISPs and that it would not deprive users from lawfully accessing copyright content on the internet.

I agree that public policy supports preventing copyright infringement for the reasons set out by Mr. Justice Arnold in The Football Association Premier League Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc & Ors [2017] EWHC 480 (Ch). Similar comments were made by Mr Justice Cregan and Mr Justice Kelly as well as myself in other cases similar to this.

There is a significant public interest in preventing the internet from being used for infringement of copyright. Such activity has a detrimental effect on the rights of creative artists to benefit from their creativity. It also interferes with the artists' livelihoods and interferes with other legitimate businesses that disseminate their material.

I will make the order sought under Section 40(5)(a) of the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000 (as amended) in terms of the draft order and draft protocol as presented.









BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2018/H54.html