BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Douglas v Gelston. [1593] Mor 8520 (#date March 1593)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1593/Mor2008520-009.html Cite as:
[1593] Mor 8520
The avail is to be considered according to the rental of the minor's free living, deducting the relict's terce and conjunct fee, but the rentals of all other lands as well as those that hold ward, are to be computed according to the profits they may yield, and not as they are let.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Douglas, sister to the Laird of Drumlanrig, pursued the Laird of Gelston for the double avail of his marriage, because she being donatrix to his ward and marriage, she had made lawful requisition to him, notwithstanding whereof, he had married without her consent. The rental of his living being given in, extending to threescore and fifteen chalders victual, and three hundred merks in silver, it was alleged, that defalcation behoved to be made of the third of his lands, whereunto his mother was kenned, which the Lords declared they would consider, cum processu.
Thereafter, it was alleged, that the defender having excambed the lands of —— with the lands of ——, no consideration could be had of the rental of the said lands analzied by excambion. The Lords found that they would respect the rental of the lands received for the excambed old heritage, albeit it was not libelled, because this defender might, by his deed, prejudge the donatrix by no posterior alienation whereby his living was altered or deteriorated. As also, they declared, that they would consider the marriage according to the avail of the hail heritage, and not only of the ward lands, albeit the marriage only fell by them. Item, They would consider the rental not according to the present duties, but as the pursuer might prove the lands to be worth, and to have them of before. Item, That requisition made to the minor having curators, put him in mala fide, and that the single avail fell, albeit no requisition was made.
