BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Nasmith v Kinloch. [1600] Mor 7254 (00 January 1600) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Mor1707254-075.html Cite as: [1600] Mor 7254 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1600] Mor 7254
Subject_1 IRRITANCY.
Subject_2 SECT. VII. Irritancies in Feus, Tacks, and Rentals, how purgeable.
Nasmith
v.
Kinloch
Case No.No 75.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action betwixt John Nasmith and John Kinloch, the Lords found, that the taking of annualrent, after the failzie, purged the clause irritant, anent the expiring of the reversion, in case of not-payment at a precise day.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting