BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Fenton v Tenants. [1610] Mor 10849 (4 December 1610) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor2610849-112a.html Cite as: [1610] Mor 10849 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1610] Mor 10849
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION III. What Title requisite in the Positive Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. VII. What Title requisite for Thirlage?
Date: Fenton
v.
Tenants
4 December 1610
Case No.No 112a.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
He who is infeft in a mill, with the multures of the lands of a barony, pursuing for the multures of abstracted corns, and especially of corns quæ erant invicta, and tholed fire and water in the barony whereof he alleged he had had possession according to his infeftment relative to the multures used and wont, the lords would not sustain his summons for corns inbrought within the barony, and tholed fire and water, unless he would either allege infeftment per expressum, or an act of thirlage before the defender's feus.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting