You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Wright v Wright. [1620] Mor 6855 (26 January 1620)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1620/Mor1706855-009.html Cite as:
[1620] Mor 6855
Days, how computed. - Induciæ in a charge of horning. - Baron decrees. - Citations pro confesso. - Criminal sentences. - Induciæ before inferior courts. - Reductions and improbations. - Privileged summons. - Decree-arbitral. - Citation of tutors and curators.
Wright v. Wright
Date: 26 January 1620 Case No. No 9.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Thomas Wright pursues James Wright to repossess a part of a ship, and to pay the profit conform to condition. The pursuer refers, instead of probation, the summons to the defender's oath, being absent, viz. the Lords ordains letter to warn the party at his dwelling, and at the cross of Edinburgh and pier of Leith on sixty days, because he is out of the country, to give his oath; quhilk citation they find as lawful as if he were personally cited within the country.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 467. Nicolson, MS. No 245. p. 173.
