BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sclaiter v Ross. [1621] Mor 2193 (22 November 1621) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1621/Mor0602193-033.html Cite as: [1621] Mor 2193 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1621] Mor 2193
Subject_1 CITATION.
Subject_2 SECT. VIII. Citation in Process upon Delinquencies.
Date: Sclaiter
v.
Ross
22 November 1621
Case No.No 33.
A Magistrate being charged to take a rebel, and disobeying; in an action against himself for the sum, found unnecessary to cite the rebel.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Andrew Sclaiter having charged Richard Ross, Bailie of Burntisland, by letters of caption, to take John Murray, who was denounced rebel at the said Andrew his instance, for not payment of certain sums; upon the Bailie's disobedience, the Bailie is pursued for payment of the sum; where the Lords found that there was no necessity to summon the party principal debtor to this pursuit, for his interest, nor that there was any necessity of a second charge against the Bailie, before that pursuit could be intented, seeing the rebel was instantly at the time of the first charge presented and shown to the Bailie. But the Lords sustained the pursuit, notwithstanding of both these allegeances.
Act. M'Gill. Alt. Lawtie. Clerk, Gibson.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting