BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomson v Kilgour. [1628] 1 Brn 51 (24 January 1628) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Brn010051-0098.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR ALEXANDER GIBSON, OF DURIE.
Date: Thomson
v.
Kilgour
24 January 1628 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a double poinding, betwixt Thomson and Kilgour,—the Lords decerned Kilgour to be answered of the mails of a tenement, and preferred him to Thomson; seeing Kilgour was infeft in the property of the land, by a public infeftment, four days before the sasine of an annual-rent, given by that same author of Kilgour's right, to Thomson also; albeit Thomson's right depended upon a procuratory of resignation made in his favours by the common author, for infeftment to be given to him of that annual-rent, divers years before the heritable right made to Kilgour; to the which date of the said preceding procuratory, he alleged that his sasine should be drawn back, and that he should be preferred to the other; especially seeing, since the said procuratory, he had uplifted the mails of the said tenement, for satisfying of his said annual-rent, divers years, which ought to corroborate his right in this Possessor Judgment; seeing also that his sasine, depending upon that procuratory, was but four days after Kilgour's sasine. Notwithstanding whereof, Kilgour was preferred.
Act. Dunlop. Alt. ——. Gibson, Clerk. Page 331.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting