BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Nithsdale v Ld. Westerhall. [1628] Mor 11075 (29 February 1628) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Mor2611075-271.html Cite as: [1628] Mor 11075 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1628] Mor 11075
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IX. Triennial Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. II. Summons of Error. - Warnings.
Date: Earl of Nithsdale
v.
Ld Westerhall.
29 February 1628
Case No.No 271.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Although, by the acts 1494 and 1617, reductions of retours prescribe in 3 years, yet it was interpreted by the Lords to be only of reducing them for error or informality of the process; but as to improbation, as false or feigned, it was found competent at any time, cum nunquam præscribitur in falso, unless it be otherwise enacted by a statutory law.
*** This case is No 25. p. 2192. voce Grounds and Warrants.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting