BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Cunningham-head v Town of Lanark. [1628] Mor 12274 (26 June 1628) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Mor2912274-024.html Cite as: [1628] Mor 12274 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1628] Mor 12274
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. II. What Proof relevant to support Defective Writs.
Date: Cunningham-head
v.
Town of Lanark
26 June 1628
Case No.No 24.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
There was a bond made by the tenants of Eastmonplaire to the Town of Lanark, whereby they obliged themselves to pay 20 bolls of victual to the Town for their thirled multures to Mousemill, which bond had a clause alleged inserted in the margin, binding them to this only during the minority of Cunningham-head their master. It happened that the margin with this clause was cut away, and the bond was put in the register so cutted and mangled. Cunningham-head intented a reduction of this bond, in respect of that clause which was contained before in the margin, wherein diverse witnesses being examined ex officio, both as many as were inserted in the bond, and others. At last it was reduced in toto, notwithstanding that it was much debated, whether or not the tenor of that marginal clause could be proved by witnesses.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting