BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> George Ker v The Town of Jedburgh. [1628] Mor 12449 (22 March 1628)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Mor2912449-280.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1628] Mor 12449      

Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I.

Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. XV.

Other allegeances, how relevant to be proved.

George Ker
v.
The Town of Jedburgh

Date: 22 March 1628
Case No. No 280.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action pursued by George Ker against the Town of Jedburgh, there being an exception admitted to the defender's probation, they raised an incident, which ran out in the whole terms, and a new term taken of the defender's own consent, to produce their whole probation; which being likewise come, the pursuer craved the term to be circumduced; and then the defender's declared they would refer the matter to the pursuer's oath, in place of all other probation: The Lords would not sustain it, because in the beginning the exception being only probable by writ or oath of party, the defenders used election at the first term, by using of an incident, and therefore they would not grant any further delay.

Spottiswood, (Probation.) p. 243.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1628/Mor2912449-280.html