BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The messenger being convened in a spuilzie as one of the spuilziers, the Lords found the allegeance proponed for him relevant to liberate him, both from the spuilzie and wrongous intromission, viz. That he poinded by virtue of the Lords' letter, directed for poinding the pursuer's goods for the debts therein contained, although the decreet whereupon poinding was raised was not given against the pursuer, for it was not his fault that the letters were wrong directed; and as he had no opportunity to see the decreet, so it was not his part to call for it, or search the same.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 391. Durie.
*** This case is No. 220. p. 6015. voce Husband and Wife.
