BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Breadie v Breadie. [1662] Mor 5070 (10 January 1662) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1662/Mor1205070-003.html Cite as: [1662] Mor 5070 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1662] Mor 5070
Subject_1 GIFT OF ESCHEAT.
Subject_2 SECT. I. Requisites of a Gift of Escheat.
Date: Breadie
v.
Breadie
10 January 1662
Case No.No 3.
The gift of the escheat of a person, who had not been convicted of a crime, tho' he had obtained a remission, found ineffectual.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
One Breadie procures the gift of his brother's escheat, as an adulterer, and pursues a declarator.—It was alleged, That he was never convicted in a criminal court for adultery.—It was answered, and offered to be proven, That he satisfied the kirk as an adulterer, and took a remission therefor.—It was replied, That no such church satisfaction or confession could be equivalent to a conviction by an assize, which only could make his escheat to fall; unless he had been denounced rebel, or declared fugative for not compearance. Nor did the taking of a remission import so much; seeing men may take remissions where there is no ground for a criminal conviction; and unless he were pursued criminally, and defended himself by his remission, and thereupon were assoilzied, the accepting of a remission could not make him guilty, to make his escheat fall.
The Lords found the allegeance relevant, and assoilzied.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting