BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl Marischal v Charles Bray. [1662] Mor 12221 (18 June 1662) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1662/Mor2912221-365.html Cite as: [1662] Mor 12221 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1662] Mor 12221
Subject_1 PROCESS.
Subject_2 SECT. XX. Competent and Omitted.
Date: Earl Marischal
v.
Charles Bray
18 June 1662
Case No.No 365.
A baron court is not such a judicatory as can give any ground for the objection of competent and omitted.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Earl of Marischal having obtained decreet, in his own baron court, against Bray, compearing for a year's rent of his Mains of Dunnottar, wherein he had been possessed by the English; Bray suspends, and alleges compensation upon a bond assigned to him, due by the charger, who answered competent and omitted, and so not receiveable in the second instance; especially being compensation, which, by special act of Parliament, is not to be admitted in the second instance.
The Lords sustained the reason of compensation, and found that a baron court was not such a judicature, as that allegeances competent and omitted should be repelled in the second instance.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting