BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Aikman. v - [1665] Mor 12311 (15 June 1665) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor2912311-074.html Cite as: [1665] Mor 12311 |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1665] Mor 12311
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. III. What Proof relevant to take away Writ.
Date: Aikman
v.
-
15 June 1665
Case No.No 74.
Probation of a defence against payment of a bond admitted partly by oath and partly by witnesses.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Aikman having charged upon a bond of borrowed money———suspended, and alleged, That the charge was truly for a prentice-fee, for a boy to a writer, who was obliged to educate him three years, and it is offered to be proved by witnesses that he beat the prentice, and put him away with evil usage, within a year and an half, and so can have no more at most than effeired to that time. The charger answered, That he could not divide the probation, in one single defence, both by oath and witnesses, and that he could not take away writing by witnesses in whole or in part.
The Lords sustained the probation by oath and witnesses, as proponed.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting