BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Andrew Littlejohn v Duchess of Monmouth. [1667] Mor 10436 (20 February 1667)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1667/Mor2510436-012.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1667] Mor 10436      

Subject_1 PERSONAL OBJECTION.

Andrew Littlejohn
v.
Duchess of Monmouth

Date: 20 February 1667
Case No. No 12.

A wife's account of furnishings for herself subscribed by her, found valid, though she was married, and a minor.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Andrew Littlejohn pursues the Duchess of Monmouth and her curators, for payment of a taylor-account, taken off by the Duchess for her marriage sow, to the foot whereof she adjoins these, words, “I acknowledge the account above written, and subscribe the same.” It was alleged by the curators, That the Countess's subscription, being after her marriage, can neither oblige herself nor her husband, because wives' obligations are ipso jure null. It was answered, That the Duchess being persona illustris, and the account for furniture to her body at her marriage, her account fell not under the nullity of ordinary obligations by wives, whose bonds are null, not so much because their subscriptions prove not the receipt of the money, as because, being in potestate viri, they cannot employ it profitably for their own use, which ceases here, the account being for necessary furnishing, which both obliges the wife and her husband, who is obliged to entertain his wife.

The Lords decerned; the pursuer always making faith that it was a just and true account truly resting and owing; and would not put the pursuer to instruct the delivery by witnesses, who are at London; considering especially, that the Duchess being such an illustrious person, her subscription could not be questioned upon so small a matter, as obtained without delivery.

Stair, v. 1. p. 445.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1667/Mor2510436-012.html