BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Argyle v George Stirline. [1668] 1 Brn 574 (8 December 1668) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1668/Brn010574-1458.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR PETER WEDDERBURN, LORD GOSFORD.
Date: Earl of Argyle
v.
George Stirline
8 December 1668 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Earl of Argyle being infeft, upon his father's forefaulture, in the lands
of Balwill, as a part of the earldom of Argyle, did pursue a removing against George Stirline,—who alleged, That he could not be decerned to remove; because he stood infeft in these said lands by a charter under the great seal, before the Earl's gift of forefaulture and infeftment. That defence was Repelled, Because the defender having no gift of these lands, upon the forefaulture, and his charter being only granted by the Exchequer, of course, upon a comprising:
The Lords found, That the King was not habili modo denuded of the right of property fallen by the forefaulture; which could only be done by a charter and infeftment upon the forefaulture: and that, notwithstanding it was alleged, that the property belonging to the King, by the forefaulture of the Earl of Argyle, who was superior of these lands; which were comprised from the Earl's vassals, who were never confirmed by the King; the charter under the great seal, granted, before the King was denuded, in favours of the pursuer, was equivalent to a confirmation of the vassal's right.
Page 20.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting