BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Calderwood v Shaw. [1668] Mor 2737 (14 November 1668) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1668/Mor0702737-071.html Cite as: [1668] Mor 2737 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1668] Mor 2737
Subject_1 COMPETENT.
Subject_2 SECT. XVI. Death-bed, how Proponable.
Date: Calderwood
v.
Shaw
14 November 1668
Case No.No 71.
In a pursuit against an heir for payment of a bond, death-bed was found competent by way of exception.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Margaret Calderwood being assigned to a bond granted by George Shaw, her deceased husband, for the sum of L. 220, did thereupon pursue Janet Shaw, as heir served and retoured to the said George, for payment thereof; which bond was holograph; and it being alleged, That holograph bonds do not prove against the heir quoad datam, and are null ipso jure, being presumed to be done upon death-bed; this allegeance was sustained, unless the pursuer would offer to prove that the bond was subscribed by the defunct before his sickness whereof he died; and that, notwithstanding it was replied, That holograph bonds are valid against the heir of the granter as well as against himself, and that it can only be objected by a third person that they do not prove quoad datam; and notwithstanding it was likewise replied, That they could not be sustained by way of exception, but by intenting reduction.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting