BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Maitland v Lesly. [1668] Mor 15978 (27 February 1668)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1668/Mor3615978-035.html
Cite as: [1668] Mor 15978

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1668] Mor 15978      

Subject_1 THIRLAGE.

Maitland
v.
Lesly

Date: 27 February 1668
Case No. No. 35.

Thirlage being constituted by infeftment, bearing multures and sequels, it was found, that the ordinary services to the mill dam and millstones were included in the infeftment.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a concluded cause of abstracted multures betwixt Maitland and Lesly, the pursuer being infeft in the mill, with the multures and sequels, and having proved the astriction of in-town multures, and witnesses being adduced concerning the services, for upholding the mill and dam, and bringing home millstones, who proved, that some of the lands were not in use of these services, but by two or three several acts, as once laying in the dam, at which the heritor was offended, and broke the tenants' heads, and twice going to help home the millstones, whether these lands were liable to the services;

Whereupon the Lords considered whether the constitution of a thirlage, with multures and sequels, did, by the nature of the right, give the ordinary mill-service, without relation to possession, so that, immediately after the constitution, these might be demanded:

Which the Lords decided affirmitivè, and then found, that these lands were liable to the service, unless they had, either by paction or prescription, attained freedom from the service, and found that the testimonies did not prove freedom for forty years, and that these acts were enough to interrupt, and so decerned for the ordinary services.

Stair, v. 1. p. 537.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1668/Mor3615978-035.html