BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Nicol Langtoun v Robert Scot. [1670] Mor 11600 (17 December 1670)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1670/Mor2711600-261.html
Cite as: [1670] Mor 11600

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1670] Mor 11600      

Subject_1 PRESUMPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IX.

Rights when presumed simulate.
Subject_3 SECT. II.

Gift of Escheat, when presumed simulate.

Nicol Langtoun
v.
Robert Scot

Date: 17 December 1670
Case No. No 261.

Simulation of a gift of liferent inferred from the rebel's obtaining the gift blank in the donatar's name.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

John Graham of Gillesby having set a tack of his lands of Graystoneflat to Nicol Langtoun, and being at that time at the horn, Robert Scot obtains a gift of his escheat and liferent from Annandale his superior, and thereupon obtains general and special declarator, decerning Langtoun to pay the duties to him as donatar. Langtoun suspends, and raises reduction on this reason, that the gift was simulate to the behoof of Graham the rebel, procured by his own means and moyen: And it being answered by Scot, That he being a lawful creditor of the rebel's, might lawfully accept and make use of this gift for his own security, albeit the rebel had procured the same; and Scot the donatar having deponed anent the simulation of the gift, and that he had it blank in the donatar's name, and that he did fill up Scot's name, and delivered it to him;

The Lords found the oath to prove the simulation of the gift; and that it having been in the rebel's own hands blank in the donatar's name, it was equivalent to an assignation from the rebel; and that Scot accepting of it so from him, could not justly or bona fide make use of it, even for security of a just debt in prejudice of the tacksman, who had before gotten his tack from the rebel.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 158. Stair, v. 1. p. 703.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1670/Mor2711600-261.html