BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
M'Pherson v M'Intosh of Stream. [1682] Mor 10929 (00 December 1682)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1682/Mor2610929-166.html Cite as:
[1682] Mor 10929
What Title requisite in the Positive Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. XIII.
What kind of possession requisite. - Connection of possession.
M'Pherson v. M'Intosh of Stream
1682.
December. Case No. No 166.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A superior having feued some lands to one who continued thereafter to come to the superior's mill for eight or ten years, and having after these years feued the mill to another, cum multuris solitis, &c.—the first feuar continued to go to the mill, and to pay insucken multures for the space of 34 years; whereupon the heritor of the mill raised a declarator of thirlage against the heritor of the lands.
Alleged for the defender; That he had his lands free, and the pursuer could only lay claim to 34 years possession of astricted multures, which is the age of his title to the mill, and could not make up prescription.
Answered for the pursuer; That the years of his author the superior's possession must be reckoned to make up the prescription, and accresce to the pursuer.
The Lords found, That the right and possession of the superior, the common author, was to be conjoined to the pursuer's right, to make up the prescription of 40 years; and declared the defender's lands to be astricted to the pursuer's mill.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. 112. Harcarse, (Prescription.) No 763. p. 216.
