BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir Alexander Hume v Mr. Patrick,his Brother. [1682] Mor 15247 (00 January 1682) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1682/Mor3515247-121.html Cite as: [1682] Mor 15247 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1682] Mor 15247
Subject_1 TACK.
Subject_2 SECT. VI. Tacks contrived as Security for Debts.
Sir Alexander Hume
v.
Mr Patrick,his Brother.
1682 .January .
Case No.No. 121.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lord Renton having, for payment of his debt, set a tack of his whole lands and casualties, to Sir Patrick Hume his son, reserving the kain fowls to his Lady and his son Sir Alexander, the apparent heir; after his lady's decease Sir Alexander claimed tne whole kains jure accrescendi, his mother and he being nomine et re conjuncti in the clause of reservation.
Answered for Sir Patrick: By the civil law jus accrescendi took no place in contracts inter vivos.
The Lords waved the point of jus accrescendi; but found, That the kain fowls did not fall under Sir Patrick's tack; and therefore belonged to the heir.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting