BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Christian Scot and Oliphant v Cockburns and Hary Sinclair. [1683] 3 Brn 457 (22 February 1683) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1683/Brn030457-0686.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date:22 February 1683 Christian Scot and Oliphant
v.
Cockburns and Hary Sinclair
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Christian Scot, and Oliphant her husband, against Cockburns, and Hary Sinclair, writer, reported by Boyn. The Lords adhered to their decreet, though most unwarrantably extracted; but restricted it to the fee of the sum liferented, and declared the defenders should not be personally liable; and allowed them instantly to prove that the whole 10,400 merks was not solely for the price of the jointure, but also for other things.
Then a bill being given in, the Lords, on the 2d March 1683, found that the fee of the 10,400 merks must be affected with the inlacks of the annualrents, due to Christian, of the said 10,400 merks, and also of the 6000 merks, to which they found she had right: and refused to free the petitioners from being personally liable, conform to the former interlocutor; and that in respect of their compearing and defending without renouncing to be heir; except, betwixt and that day eight days, they so secure the pursuer in that sum of 10,400 merks, at the sight of the Lord Boyn, as that the current annualrents may be recovered, and that the fee may be affected with the inlacks; in which case, they assoilyie the petitioners defenders from being personally liable.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting