BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Hisleside v Littlegill. [1683] Mor 3876 (00 March 1683)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1683/Mor0903876-066.html Cite as:
[1683] Mor 3876
The appretiation in the confirmed testament may be corrected by a confirmation ad male appretiata, or by proof of higher value. - License to pursue.
Hisleside v. Littlegill
1683.
March Case No. No 66.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Found that goods confirmed in a testament may be proven by witnesses to be male appretiata, at the instance of an executor ad male appretiata, notwithstanding of the oath given as to the value by the principal executor at the confirmation, that being only an oath of credulity.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 275. Harcarse, (Executry.) No 451. p. 124.
