BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Earl of Southesk v Roger Softly, &c. [1684] 3 Brn 493 (19 January 1684)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1684/Brn030493-0741.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1684] 3 Brn 493      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date: 19 January 1684

The Earl of Southesk
v.
Roger Softly, &c


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Earl of Southesk's action against Roger Softly of Holmes, and others, or multures, was this day advised; and the Lords restricted the process to the years since the pursuer's infeftment produced, viz. 1659, reserving to the pursuer to insist in another process for the years preceding the same; and sustain process for all years since the citation, and for five years preceding it, because of the quinquennial prescription of multures introduced by the Act of Parliament 1669; which allegeance of prescription for any years after the said Act of Parl, they sustain; and find the astriction and quantities proven against the said Roger by the decreet produced, and decern against him for the space of 12 years, during which space he acknowledges he has possessed. And also find the astriction and quantity proven by the decreet produced, against Maxwell of Cowheath, Brown of Nunland, and Maxwell of Hills; and assign the day of next, to their procurators to produce them, to depone anent

the time of their possession; the said Maxwell of Hills his oath being only reriled from as to the having of writs, but not as to any other point in the process.

Vol. I. Page 262.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1684/Brn030493-0741.html