BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Glendinning and Maxwell v Glendinning and Carsan. [1685] Mor 9213 (24 March 1685)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1685/Mor2209213-066.html Cite as:
[1685] Mor 9213
A person in possession by a voluntary deed cannot invert this possession, in prejudice of the Granter. The same holds with regard to legal Disponees.
Glendinning and Maxwell v. Glendinning and Carsan
Date: 24 March 1685 Case No. No 66.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords advised the count and reckoning pursued by Glendinning and Maxwell, against Glendinning and Carsan; and they found, that a ratification of a wadset right of 3000 merks did not hinder nor debar the granter of the ratification to propone payment upon discharges given by the wadsetter, prior to the said ratification, seeing it was only given in corroboration of the said right; and found these discharges were valid and probative, being between master and tenant, though not signed before witnesses; and that the wadsetter having been once in possession, he could not invert it by designing himself in the discharges only as factor to James Chalmers, an appriser; for though James was preferable, yet the wadsetter should not voluntarily have ceded the possession, unless he had been legally put from it; and they found a note of a messenger's poinding some oxen not sufficient to instruct that the creditor poinded them; because it was not by way of instrument, nor were the letters of poinding produced.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 598. Fountainhall, v. 1. p. 356.
