BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mrs Ruthven v Lord Reidfoord and Hugh Wallace. [1686] 2 Brn 94 (00 March 1686) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1686/Brn020094-0243.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR ROGER HOG OF HARCARSE.
Mrs Ruthven
v.
Lord Reidfoord and Hugh Wallace
1686 .March .Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Hugh Wallace, cash-keeper, who had right to several apprisings upon the lands of Corstorphin, having, by a contract with my Lord Reidfoord, a creditor, preferred his Lordship, and communicated to him these rights; and thereafter consented to an annualrent of £100 sterling, to Mr Ruthven's Lady; in a competition with her and my Lord, it was alleged for the latter, That apprisings may be qualified and restricted by personal obligements and rights. Answered for Mrs Ruthven, That no personal obligement could qualify Mr Wallace's apprising, in prejudice of Mrs Ruthven, as a singular successor, whose right is real by infeftment. The Lords preferred Mrs Ruthven, Vide No. 310, [Sinclair of Southstone against Sinclair of Stanestone, January 1685.]
Page 77, No. 318.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
