BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Sir William Binning v Hope of Carse. [1687] 3 Brn 650 (16 November 1687)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1687/Brn030650-0997.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date: 16 November 1687
Sir William Binning v. Hope of Carse
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir William Binning, late Provost of Edinburgh, pursues Hope of Carse on the testament of Colonel Gordon, who died in Germany, and was the third who, with Lesly and Butler, killed Valston Duke of Fritland. Alleged,—This cause was res hactenus judicata in Holland, and the Lady Carse was assoilyied there. Answered,—The process there was upon its privilege, as being testamentum militare; and here it is not insisted on super eo medio, but as holograph; and it is certain that res judicata takes no place, except the two libels be both super eodem medio. And they cited Boeckleman, de Action. where he tells of one that had been ter victus, coming to him; and he caused him intent the right and genuine action, wherein he prevailed, though he had so often succumbed before.
The Lords having advised this on the 23d of November, they found the Lady Carse had shunned to exhibit these papers upon oath, and, to evade it, had retired out of the kingdom to Holland; and had assigned and conveyed her jointure, and all her effects, and particularly this right, to some confidant for her son's behoof; so that a sentence against her would be elusory, and frustraneous,—she being extra regnum, and having nothing to affect. Therefore, before answer, they ordained Carse, her son, betwixt and eight days, either to state himself as party, and legitimus contradictor, et litem in se suscipere, and to find caution judicatum solvi, or else they would instantly decern against her.
And, he having stated himself as party, they directed two commissions,—one to Holland, for her to depone anent the having, and to try if this defence was proponed there, to take off the res judicata; and the other directed to Lubeck, where the testament was made, to inquire if holograph testaments by their law be probative. The event of this process was of great importance, being upwards of 40,000 rixdollars; and Sir William, in journeys to Holland and in processes, had wared more than £1000 sterling in it.
