BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> John Ker and Rachael Ker v Wauchop of Niddry. [1694] 4 Brn 201 (25 July 1694)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040201-0453.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1694] 4 Brn 201      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.

John Ker and Rachael Ker
v.
Wauchop of Niddry

Date: 25 July 1694

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Lords advised the cause pursued by John and Rachael Kers against Wauchop of Niddry, for payment of £1000, contained in his father's bond. The Lords, ex officio, had examined witnesses on sundry presumptions, that it was granted ob non causam, for a transaction and disposition in 1654, between him and Ker of Lochtour, which never took effect; and, having advised the probation now, they find it proven that it was so granted, and therefore assoilyied. Though this be a dangerous preparative, to take away clear bonds by witnesses' depositions, yet there was so clear a chain of presumptions connected here, that the Lords were convinced that this bond was granted in contemplation of the disposition then given, and which never took effect, but was passed from by entering into a new bargain in 1661, where two thousand merks is advanced in money, and a bond for 10,000 merks given, and the old £10,000 bond is forgot to be retired: and thir pursuers' mother lived twenty-one years after, and never claimed the first bond, but accepted annualrent of the second yearly; which she would not have done, if the first had been a perfected bargain.

Vol. I. Page 637.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040201-0453.html