BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Mr. George Alexander, Advocate, and one Ker, v Alexander Clark. [1696] Mor 14873 (20 February 1696)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1696/Mor3414873-012.html Cite as:
[1696] Mor 14873
Mr George Alexander, Advocate, and one Ker, v. Alexander Clark
Date: 20 February 1696 Case No. No. 12.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr. George Alexander, and one Ker, raise a reduction of Alexander Clark's service as heir to his grandfather's sister's daughter, (of whose ultimus hæres they had a gift from the Exchequer,) upon this ground, that, by our law, there was no succession by the mother's line, as Craig asserts, Lib. 2. Dieg. 14. De successione fæminea, and Stair, Tit. 26. Of Succession, § 34. shews there is no place for cognates. So also Mackenzie, Institut. p. 294. The other party adduced also pasages seemingly in his favours, from all the three, as Craig, Lib. 2. Dieg. 17. affirming, while there is any alive who can instruct contingency of blood to the defunct, they ought to succed and debar an ultimus hæres.—But that is in the agnatick line; and as to Regiam Majestatem, Lib. 2. Cap. 25. many of our Lawyers disown it from being any part of our law; esto it were, it is now in desuetude. The Lords preferred the donatar to the ultimus hæres. See Stair, Book 4. Tit. 22. that bastards are not secluded from the mother's succession, nor those of her line. This should be amended by an act of Parliament, that there may be no room hereafter for an ultimus hæres in such cases.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 397. Fountainhall, v. 1. p. 713.
