BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Cuming v Kennedy and her Husband. [1699] Mor 12959 (20 January 1699) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1699/Mor3012959-085.html Cite as: [1699] Mor 12959 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1699] Mor 12959
Subject_1 PROVISION to HEIRS and CHILDREN.
Subject_2 SECT. XI. Obligation to provide the conquest to the issue of a marriage. Import of this obligation with regard to the father.
Date: Cuming
v.
Kennedy and her Husband
20 January 1699
Case No.No 85.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A clause of conquest, in a contract of marriage, was to the children there of. One daughter only existed, who had also only one daughter by a first marriage. She married again. The grandfather made that grandchild his universal legatee. In a competition betwixt the grandchild and her mother, the Lords sustained the universal legacy, and found, That the clause of conquest did not restrain the granter, but that he might even by testament legate his goods to his grandchild, seeing the daughter had been competently provided by him in her first contract of marriage, and that the deed was not wholly gratuitous but rational.
*** This case is No 41. p. 6443. voce Implied Discharge.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting