BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Gillespie v Carses. [1705] Mor 9806 (21 November 1705) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1705/Mor2309806-135.html Cite as: [1705] Mor 9806 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1705] Mor 9806
Subject_1 PASSIVE TITLE.
Subject_2 DIVISION II. Lucrative Successor post contractum debitum.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. How the Passive Title of Lucrative Succession is purged. What sort of Creditors have the Benefit of this Passive Title.
Date: Gillespie
v.
Carses
21 November 1705
Case No.No 135.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A party who had only one son, and grandchildren by a deceased daughter, disponed his estate, first to the grandchildren, and thereafter to his son, who obtained himself first infeft. In a competition, the Lords found, That though the son had the first complete right, yet seeing he became thereby lucrative successor, he was bound to warrant his father's deed in favour of the grandchildren, and could not quarrel the same; upon which ground the grandchildren were preferred.
*** This case is No 126. p. 9796.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting