BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The College of Aberdeen v The Crafts of Aberdeen. [1710] 4 Brn 792 (14 February 1710) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1710/Brn040792-0297.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Subject_2 I sat in the Outer-House this week.
Date: The College of Aberdeen
v.
The Crafts of Aberdeen
14 February 1710 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Dr William Guild, professor of divinity in Aberdeen, mortifies 5000 merks, in 1655, to maintain three bursars at the college, to be chosen out of the sons of craftsmen, on a testificate, from the minister of St Nicholas church there, that they have engines fit for learning, and that none intrude themselves but such as are truly poor and necessitous: and names the deacons of trades in Aberdeen to be overseers and patrons of the mortification, and charges them to be faithful, as they shall answer one day to God. And requires these bursars, if laureate, to give an obligement, if God bless them with worldly means, to add something, more or less, to the mortification.
The crafts of Aberdeen not having three to present who were found qualified; the principal and masters of the college pursue them to present other tradesmen's sons, to prevent and supply the vacancy.
Alleged,—By the strain and tenor of the mortification, they can only present tradesmen's sons born in Aberdeen; and failing of such, they are not to seek them from other places in the shire; but the rents of the mortified money goes up to increase the fund and stock, by which, in process of time, it may be able to maintain more boys than three: And to present others without the town, is a visible prejudice to them; for, it lasting three or four years, their children are turning qualified in that time, and yet are debarred by these strangers: And the mortifier being a tradesman's son in Aberdeen, it is beyond doubt he meant only them, and no others.
Answered,—They acknowledge the sons of tradesmen-burgesses there have the preference, but there is no clause in the gift restricting them to such, when they are not to be had with the qualifications required of poverty and pregnant engines. And it is known the trades have misapplied the funds. And such inversions are, by the Act of Parliament, declared pursuable actione populari, at the instance of any inhabitant or burgess.
The Lords found it consonant to the will of the mortifier, as expressed in the gift, That, though the Aberdeen tradesmen's sons were preferred primo loco, yet, iis deficientibus, the patrons behoved to present other qualified boys in their room.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting