BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Roger Hepburn, Petitioner. [1710] 4 Brn 796 (3 June 1710)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1710/Brn040796-0303.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1710] 4 Brn 796      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Subject_2 I sat in the Outer-House this week.

Roger Hepburn, Petitioner

Date: 3 June 1710

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Mr Roger Hepburn, advocate, being a real creditor to Hepburn of Nunraw, and infeft in his lands; and the mill needing reparation,—he gives in a bill to the Lords, representing, he was going to repair the same; but having caused wrights and masons visit the same, they reported that it would require several sorts of timber, which, if bought, would put the heritor, who is minor, to a great expense; and there was timber enough growing on the lands, proper for that use, which, if allowed to be cutted, would save much needless charges: and, therefore, craved the Lords' warrant for that effect. In the arguing, it was thought it behoved to be either planting or policy about the house, or growing in a wood.

As to the first,—Whatever an absolute proprietor might do, they would never allow a creditor to deteriorate the land, by touching it. If in a wood, unless it were actually cutting, it could not be allowed, for the stool would be lost: and it was not enough, that it was silva cædua, and fit for cutting, unless it were begun to be cut down in haggs; and therefore refused the desire of the bill; though it seemed a prejudice to the minor to put him to buy other timber, when he had it of his own, fit for the purpose, on his ground: But the damnifying of the wood prepondered with the Lords, unless it had been fenced and hayned.

Vol. II. Page 574.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1710/Brn040796-0303.html