BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sinclair of Freswick v Dean of Guild of Wick, and Bailies of Thurso. [1729] Mor 8672 (1 January 1729)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1729/Mor2108672-084.html
Cite as: [1729] Mor 8672

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1729] Mor 8672      

Subject_1 MEMBER of PARLIAMENT.
Subject_2 DIVISION III.

The Qualification of Freeholders possessing Lands liable in Public Burden for L. 400 Scots.
Subject_3 SECT. VI.

Who may act as Commissioners of Supply. - Time of their meeting. - Consequences of their refusing to meet or divide.

Sinclair of Freswick
v.
Dean of Guild of Wick, and Bailies of Thurso

Date: 1 January 1729
Case No. No 84.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action against the Dean of Guild of Wick and Bailies of Thurso, as liable to the penalty of L. 20, for having acted as Commissioners of Supply in the shire of Caithness, without being possessed of the legal qualifications required by the then act of supply, the Lords assoilzied; for they thought that these qualifications related only to particular persons nominatim appointed Commissioners, not to those appointed virtute officii.

N. B. The persons now entitled to act are such as stand infeft in lands within the county, of L. 100 valued rent in property or superiority, or their eldest sons and heirs apparent; and Provosts, Bailies, Deans of Guild, Treasurers, Masters of Merchant Companies, or Deacon Conveners of the trades, for the time, of any royal burgh, and Bailies of burghs of regality and barony, if mentioned in the act, either by name, or by their office. See Appendix.

Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 410.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1729/Mor2108672-084.html