BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Roseberry v Geddes of Scotstoun, &c. [1740] Mor 10405 (23 July 1740) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1740/Mor2510405-084.html Cite as: [1740] Mor 10405 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1740] Mor 10405
Subject_1 PERSONAL and TRANSMISSIBLE.
Subject_2 SECT. III. What Rights go to Assignees.
Date: Earl of Roseberry
v.
Geddes of Scotstoun, &c
23 July 1740
Case No.No 84.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Earl of Roseberry's estate being sequestrated by the Lords at the suit of his creditors, and L. 100 Sterling yearly allowed to himself in name of aliment; upon a complaint by the Earl against certain of his creditors for having poinded his horse, which he affirmed to have been purchased by him with the money allowed for his aliment, the Lords founds, “That the horse being by the execution of poinding estimated at L. 9 Sterling, was not poindable, and ordained the poinder to restore.”
The day before, the Lords had found another horse of his poindable, because being of L. 50 Sterling value, such horse could not be presumed purchased by his aliment; but a horse of so low a value as L. 9 was what reasonably might be purchased out of the aliment for his use, and so was as little poindable as the aliment itself was arrestable.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting