BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Robertson v Mrs Jean Kerr. [1742] 2 Elchies 400 (3 February 1742)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1742/Elchies020400-019.html
Cite as: [1742] 2 Elchies 400

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1742] 2 Elchies 400      

Subject_1 MUTUAL CONTRACT.

Robertson
v.
Mrs Jean Kerr

Date: 3 February 1742
Case No. No. 19.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Major Robertson by contract of marriage became bound to provide 30,000 merks and conquest to himself and his wife in conjunct-fee and liferent, and children of the marriage, whom failing, his heirs and assignees in fee; and by his testament, (his estate being still moveable,) bequeathed the whole to his son and only child; and failing him, he substituted his wife, with the burden of certain considerable legacies in case of his son's death before majority; so that it seemed to be his intention, that the son should not have power to alter during minority. The son died during minority, and the relict thereon succeeded to the whole executry. The Major's brother served heir of provision to the Majorin the contract, and claimed implemented of the 30,000 merks;—but the Lords found that he had no claim on the contract, for they thought that such a substitution of money provisions in a contract failing issue of the marriage, to the man's heirs and assignees, which is common in merchant's contracts, is not intended to make the man's whole stocking heritable; nor 2dly, to hinder him, failing issue, from the power of testing; and 3dly, that it was sufficiently implemented notwithstanding the substitution unalterable in minority, and that the son could not himself have quarrelled it; and if there had been no substitution, the Major's executry would not have been heritable or gone to the pursuer as heir. Vide inter eosdem voce Legitim,— Testament, —Writ.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1742/Elchies020400-019.html