BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Clark v The Duke of Queensberry. [1747] Mor 15747 (14 July 1747)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1747/Mor3615747-146.html Cite as:
[1747] Mor 15747
The rent paid is the rule in valuations, without addition on account of the circumstances that the tenants pay the cess.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
George Clark of Middlebie pursuing a valuation of his teinds, against the Duke The rent paid of Queensberry, titular, it was alleged for the defender, That the tenants of the lands paid the land-tax, on account whereof they no doubt had cheaper tacks; and as the value of the estate was what it could pay, including the tax, which was a burden on the landlord, an addition ought to be made to the rental in consideration thereof.
The Lords Commissioners found the rent paid to be the rule, without any addition on account of the tenants paying the cess.
Act. R. Pringle.Alt. Clark.
D. Falconer, v. 2. No.198. p. 264.
*** The following is the same case, by Kilkerran, under different names and date, viz.
1747. July 22. Maxwell of Middleby. against The Duke of Queensberry.
In a valuation pursued by Middleby of his teinds, parsonage and vicarage, against the Duke of Queensberry, titular of both, the Lords found, That neither poultry paid by the tenant, nor the cess whereof the tenant had no relief, were to be added to the rental.
