BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Nairn v His Creditors. [1750] Mor 13324 (14 June 1750)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1750/Mor3113324-019.html Cite as:
[1750] Mor 13324
Form and steps of the process. Real creditors not in possession, how to be called? Creditors to bring a sale, must be in possession of the estate.
Nairn v. His Creditors
Date: 14 June 1750 Case No. No 19.
Where a new proof is allowed of a subject, however small, there must be new letters of publication.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
After the ranking of the Creditors of John Nairn of Greenyards was finished, the sale advised, his lands of Greenyards and others appointed to be sold, and letters of publication executed, a petition was presented by the said John Nairn, setting forth, That there was a certain pendicle of land in the rental, to which one witness only had deponed, and that no value had been put thereon in the sale; and craving, that before the sale should proceed, a proof might still be allowed of the value thereof, and that the same, when proved, might be added to the valuation already put on the estate; and it appearing to be so in fact, the Lords “allowed a new proof, and granted incident diligence.”
But then the question was, Whether new letters of publication would be necessary? Where a price is upon application lowered, as is often done, no new publication is made; but this was thought to be a different case; and there is no arguing from the one case to the other, as the proved price must always be engrossed in the letters of publication.
And so much were the Lords of this opinion, that a petition for John Nairn, the common debtor, craving that the proof already led by the one witness might be held as proof of the value, and that the roup might be allowed to proceed without new letters of publication, was refused, notwithstanding the whole creditors concurred in the request.
In a judicial sale, the Lords are the sellers, and are not to dispense with the forms of law, even at the desire of the creditors.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 208. Kilkerran, (Ranking and Sale.) No 12. p. 473.
