BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Creditors of Roderick Chalmers. [1752] 1 Elchies 415 (25 January 1752) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1752/Elchies010415-009.html Cite as: [1752] 1 Elchies 415 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1752] 1 Elchies 415
Subject_1 SALE.
Creditors of Roderick Chalmers
1752 ,Jan. 25 .
Case No.No. 9.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the ranking and sale of Chalmers's effects, there were among other subjects two houses encumbered with a liferent, and valued the one at 9 the other at 10 years purchase, and exposed to sale four times at that price, payable on the determination of the liferent, in the usual form, but were not purchased. None would offer the sum; and a petition was presented in name of the whole creditors, whose debts the petition said far exceeded the value of the subject, stating the case and the difficulty of finding purchasers in these terms, and the disadvantage to the creditors in having the price only payable at so distant a term, and therefore praying, as it would be more beneficial to them, to set them up at two years purchase of both; and that though the apparent-heir was not in the country to consent, yet he could have no prejudice, because the highest value of the subjects was far short of the debts. This prayer was so unprecedented, that the Lords could not grant it. And I thought that in every sale of a bankrupt estate encumbered with liferents, the subject ought to be turned into money as quickly as possible, and that at the present value it would give, which would be doing in effect the same thing quoad the creditors, that the 20th act 1690 empowers the Court to do as to liferent escheats, only we have no authority to compel other liferenters to sell, which would not be reasonable; but I thought that would require a regulation of the Court, and likewise a proof of the value of the chance, that is, the value of the lands presently payable, the buyer taking his hazard of the liferent.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting